In semiconductor design, parasitics are the unintended electrical effects and interactions caused by the interconnect wires. Parasitics alter the behavior of a circuit in complex ways, and their impact has grown from an afterthought to a first-order effect. Analysis and debug of analog interconnect parasitics too often rely on a patchwork of vendors and point tools that fail to address the growing complexity of multiphysics requirements with any clear strategy.
Analog integrated circuits (ICs), or chips, have been around since the dawn of the semiconductor age and analog engineers have grown to rely on a design methodology and ecosystem that are quite distinct from that of the larger, more glamorous digital chips. But in the past few years there has been a significant surge in demand for analog design driven by powerful market trends like the pervasive adoption of wireless connectivity, electric vehicles, high-speed digital connectivity in data centers, and multi-die 3D-ICs. This has caused leading design companies to focus on creating more efficient and capable analog design flows to remain competitive and take advantage of this market opportunity.
Unlike the digital IC world, analog designers have mostly not chased after the latest and greatest silicon process technologies, which are optimized for large, high-density digital designs. In fact, analog designers are more comfortable working with mature, trailing processes that offer more control over signal quality in their typically smaller, higher-speed circuits. However, the surge in analog design has come with a set of challenges.
These technical challenges all contribute to the biggest challenge of all: designer productivity. The delivery schedule and design cost of an analog chip is largely determined by the number of engineering hours it absorbs. An analog engineer’s time is dominated by circuit analysis and debug. It’s reported that 35% to 50% of the total project time can be consumed by these activities – and in some cases much more. Debugging is often unpredictable and can be quite time-consuming because it involves multiple simulation runs and the use of various extraction and analysis tools to understand what’s happening with the design. Particularly for advanced silicon processes, the layout parasitics have become a first-order effect – sometimes even dominating the behavior of the active devices (transistors). Interconnect effects and parasitics have become central to both circuit behavior and total design cost.
The reasons for their increased impact are the ever-larger parasitic resistance and capacitance (RC) values and the growing number of parasitic elements. This leads to longer simulation times and complex, non-linear interactions that are often counter-intuitive and difficult for designers to understand and debug.
Parasitic resistance increases exponentially in more advanced silicon processes. This is one factor making parasitics a first-order effect in modern analog design.
It stands to reason that successful analog design teams need to have a well-thought-out strategy for dealing with the many multiphysics effects caused by layout interconnect. Not only for today’s issues, but also a strategy for future requirements that will inevitably be even more complex, possibly involving new materials like silicon carbide (SiC), or new physics like photonics.
Today, many design houses have a fragmented approach to interconnect analysis with many different vendors that reflect how point-solutions were added over time to plug holes in the design flow. We believe it is time to stand back and approach the interconnect multiphysics domain as a distinct area of expertise that calls for the same strategic approach used to select layout platforms or simulation software.
They say you can’t fix what you can’t measure. The electrical models for active devices in a process design kit (PDK) are created with a dedicated suite of library characterization tools and captured in a library for easy reuse. But this doesn’t work for interconnect parasitics: every layout must be extracted from scratch, for every design iteration as shown in the figure below. That is why analog design engineers devote so much time and effort to interconnect analysis. Ansys has recognized the importance of interconnect analysis as a distinct design issue and offers design teams a consolidated, strategic solution.
Ansys provides a comprehensive, strategic solution to the growing productivity and accuracy challenge of analyzing and debugging parasitic interactions for high-speed designs, advanced process nodes, and very large analog circuits.
Ansys offers a broad array of proven and foundry-certified multiphysics solutions to cover all interconnect effects on semiconductors targeted at giving designers a full spectrum of design insights with root-cause analyses of parasitic interactions. This integrated multiphysics approach ensures high-accuracy-proven engines for better results and high-efficiency debugging to save time. Ansys’ long track-record of success in multi-scale solutions also allows these same chip multiphysics tools to extend to the package, PCB, 3D-IC, and product levels.
The interconnect multiphysics covered by Ansys solutions include products and platforms for all the following areas of concern to analog and mixed signal designers:
Parasitic interconnect effects have a huge impact on circuit behavior and are increasingly multiphysics-driven and intertwined. A piecemeal approach to addressing these challenges reduces engineering efficiency, increases design costs, and limits design optimization. The interconnect analysis market should be approached with the same strategic mindset as other critical design sectors to not only increase efficiency today but also future proof your design flow for the new requirements that you will face as technology demands accelerate.